AW: [browsershots-factories] Reward people who have a high -m setting
Thomas Schaaf
thomas at schaafs.net
Thu May 8 22:21:28 CEST 2008
I am not only talking about money.. I want the service to be better.. and I
would love if the service would check if it is the wanted domain or if it
should wait a bit longer..
=
Thomas
=
Von: browsershots-factories-bounces at lists.browsershots.org
[mailto:browsershots-factories-bounces at lists.browsershots.org] Im Auftrag
von Scott McMullan
Gesendet: Donnerstag, 8. Mai 2008 22:11
An: Ian Egland; browsershots-factories at lists.browsershots.org
Betreff: RE: [browsershots-factories] Reward people who have a high -m
setting
=
I don't know how hard it would be to revamp the accounting and payment
system, but it seems weird (to me) to waste cycles on that task. There are
so many distributed computing platforms that offer zero support for the
contributors, but ask for all your spare cycles. I've appreciated the
service I've gotten from browsershots, and I'm giving cycles more because I
appreciate it, than for the kickbacks. The few dollars I'll get out of it
is nowhere near the value of my time to set up and babysit the factories; if
my monthly kickback is $10 under the current scheme or $15 under any new
scheme, I'd rather have Johann spend his time making the servers faster or
the code more reliable, and let some other contributor get "my" $5.
=
_____ =
From: browsershots-factories-bounces at lists.browsershots.org
[mailto:browsershots-factories-bounces at lists.browsershots.org] On Behalf Of
Ian Egland
Sent: Thursday, May 08, 2008 3:59 PM
To: browsershots-factories at lists.browsershots.org
Subject: Re: [browsershots-factories] Reward people who have a high -m
setting
Same here, but I agree with his argument all the same. It's quality that
should be rewarded, not quantity.
-Ian
On Thu, May 8, 2008 at 3:56 PM, Scott McMullan <smcmullan at targetrx.com>
wrote:
Does the default behavior for this vary windows vs. linux?
I'm only running Windows factories, haven't touched -m, and it seems to
scroll down all the way for every page I've seen.
=
_____ =
From: browsershots-factories-bounces at lists.browsershots.org
[mailto:browsershots-factories-bounces at lists.browsershots.org] On Behalf Of
Ian Egland
Sent: Thursday, May 08, 2008 3:53 PM
To: browsershots-factories at lists.browsershots.org
Subject: Re: [browsershots-factories] Reward people who have a high -m
setting
I second that.
On Thu, May 8, 2008 at 1:10 PM, Thomas Schaaf <thomas at schaafs.net> wrote:
Okay since some people didn't understand me:
You get money for every screenshot you take.
If you change the -m Parameter you can change how many times the program
scrolls. The greater the number the bigger the document which has to be
uploaded with every 3 scrolls the size basically doubles which makes the
upload time double as well. Because time is money I lose money because I am
nice. I know this is not only about money but why should people who only
scroll once get the same money like the people that's machines scroll 6 or
even 8 times. I think this parameter should not be allowed to change except
by the server. That way people who are supporting us if they have long
webpages can look at them and take screenshots. Those who are not, don't get
that long of a site and 5 scrollings are enough. 10 is a lot so I think it
is fair.
Thomas
-----Urspr=FCngliche Nachricht-----
Von: browsershots-factories-bounces at lists.browsershots.org
[mailto:browsershots-factories-bounces at lists.browsershots.org] Im Auftrag
von Dominik Honnef
Gesendet: Donnerstag, 8. Mai 2008 18:48
An: browsershots-factories at lists.browsershots.org
Betreff: Re: [browsershots-factories] Reward people who have a high -m
setting
What do you mean by reward and what do you mean by 5 and 10?
On [Thu, 08.05.2008 16:54], Thomas Schaaf wrote:
> Hi!
>
>
>
> I think it is unfair that the =96m setting is not being rewarded. Making
just one
> screenshot instead of 6 takes a lot less time( specially the upload)! I
think
> this is not fair and for that reason I think people with a higher =96m
should get
> rewarded.. you can track how many screens they up.. if its 1 or 6..
>
>
>
> What would be best is 5 for non priority users and 10 for priority
>
>
>
> Greetings,
>
> Thomas
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> browsershots-factories mailing list
> browsershots-factories at lists.browsershots.org
> http://lists.browsershots.org/mailman/listinfo/browsershots-factories
--
Dominik Honnef
_______________________________________________
browsershots-factories mailing list
browsershots-factories at lists.browsershots.org
http://lists.browsershots.org/mailman/listinfo/browsershots-factories
_______________________________________________
browsershots-factories mailing list
browsershots-factories at lists.browsershots.org
http://lists.browsershots.org/mailman/listinfo/browsershots-factories
=
_______________________________________________
browsershots-factories mailing list
browsershots-factories at lists.browsershots.org
http://lists.browsershots.org/mailman/listinfo/browsershots-factories
=
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://lists.browsershots.org/pipermail/browsershots-factories/attachm=
ents/20080508/cc7db384/attachment.htm
More information about the browsershots-factories
mailing list