AW: [browsershots-factories] Reward people who have a high -m setting

[Benjamin Hunt]

so basicly you say we should be rewarded in function of the megabytes?

Op 8-mei-08, om 22:21 heeft Thomas Schaaf het volgende geschreven:

> The default for the m parameter is 6. Which is plenty for most.
>
> It always comes to the bottom since the last screenshot is always of  =

> the end.
>
> A great example is http://winfuture.de/newsarchiv-auswahl, =

> 4,2008.html  looking at screenshots (https://browsershots.org/http://winf=
uture.de/newsarchiv-auswahl,4,2008.html) =

>  shows that not everything is captured since the site reallllly  =

> long(look in detail not every date is there but the last part is).  =

> As you can tell some screenshots are shorter and some are longer  =

> than others. This is due to the m parameter. If I compare https://browser=
shots.org/screenshots/7df2e8059444b6edf081199153702da7/ =

>  andhttps://browsershots.org/screenshots/ =

> c86c51d2ada9f08490b73847854c764b/ I think the first one should get 3  =

> or even 4 times the credit for it..
>
> Thomas
>
> Von: browsershots-factories-bounces at lists.browsershots.org [mailto:browse=
rshots-factories-bounces at lists.browsershots.org =

> ] Im Auftrag von Scott McMullan
> Gesendet: Donnerstag, 8. Mai 2008 21:56
> An: browsershots-factories at lists.browsershots.org
> Betreff: RE: [browsershots-factories] Reward people who have a high - =

> m setting
>
> Does the default behavior for this vary windows vs. linux?
> I'm only running Windows factories, haven't touched -m, and it seems  =

> to scroll down all the way for every page I've seen.
>
> From: browsershots-factories-bounces at lists.browsershots.org [mailto:brows=
ershots-factories-bounces at lists.browsershots.org =

> ] On Behalf Of Ian Egland
> Sent: Thursday, May 08, 2008 3:53 PM
> To: browsershots-factories at lists.browsershots.org
> Subject: Re: [browsershots-factories] Reward people who have a high - =

> m setting
> I second that.
> On Thu, May 8, 2008 at 1:10 PM, Thomas Schaaf <thomas at schaafs.net>  =

> wrote:
> Okay since some people didn't understand me:
> You get money for every screenshot you take.
> If you change the -m Parameter you can change how many times the  =

> program scrolls. The greater the number the bigger the document  =

> which has to be uploaded with every 3 scrolls the size basically  =

> doubles which makes the upload time double as well. Because time is  =

> money I lose money because I am nice. I know this is not only about  =

> money but why should people who only scroll once get the same money  =

> like the people that's machines scroll 6 or even 8 times. I think  =

> this parameter should not be allowed to change except by the server.  =

> That way people who are supporting us if they have long webpages can  =

> look at them and take screenshots. Those who are not, don't get that  =

> long of a site and 5 scrollings are enough. 10 is a lot so I think  =

> it is fair.
>
> Thomas
> -----Urspr=FCngliche Nachricht-----
> Von: browsershots-factories-bounces at lists.browsershots.org [mailto:browse=
rshots-factories-bounces at lists.browsershots.org =

> ] Im Auftrag von Dominik Honnef
> Gesendet: Donnerstag, 8. Mai 2008 18:48
> An: browsershots-factories at lists.browsershots.org
> Betreff: Re: [browsershots-factories] Reward people who have a high - =

> m setting
>
> What do you mean by reward and what do you mean by 5 and 10?
>
> On [Thu, 08.05.2008 16:54], Thomas Schaaf wrote:
> > Hi!
> >
> >
> >
> > I think it is unfair that the =96m setting is not being rewarded.  =

> Making just one
> > screenshot instead of 6 takes a lot less time( specially the  =

> upload)! I think
> > this is not fair and for that reason I think people with a higher =96 =

> m should get
> > rewarded.. you can track how many screens they up.. if its 1 or 6..
> >
> >
> >
> > What would be best is 5 for non priority users and 10 for priority
> >
> >
> >
> > Greetings,
> >
> > Thomas
> >
> >
> >
>
> > _______________________________________________
> > browsershots-factories mailing list
> > browsershots-factories at lists.browsershots.org
> > http://lists.browsershots.org/mailman/listinfo/browsershots- =

> factories
>
>
> --
> Dominik Honnef
> _______________________________________________
> browsershots-factories mailing list
> browsershots-factories at lists.browsershots.org
> http://lists.browsershots.org/mailman/listinfo/browsershots-factories
>
> _______________________________________________
> browsershots-factories mailing list
> browsershots-factories at lists.browsershots.org
> http://lists.browsershots.org/mailman/listinfo/browsershots-factories
>
> _______________________________________________
> browsershots-factories mailing list
> browsershots-factories at lists.browsershots.org
> http://lists.browsershots.org/mailman/listinfo/browsershots-factories

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://lists.browsershots.org/pipermail/browsershots-factories/attachm=
ents/20080508/5a837d34/attachment.htm